Subscribe via RSS Feed

The Resurrection of Jesus, A Jewish Perspective

From Pneuma Review Spring 2004

The Resurrection of Jesus, A Jewish Perspective. Pinchas Lapide. Wipf and Stock Publishers (Eugene, OR: 2002).

I first encountered Rabbi Lapide in the mid-1980s in a televised debate with noted Christian theologian Walter Kaiser, Jr. I was dumbfounded to hear this Orthodox rabbi state that Jesus “might be the Messiah” but that the Jewish community would not know for certain until His return. I learned that this rabbi had been one of only a handful of Hebraic scholars permitted to examine the gospel texts, and that he had been permitted to author a book on his findings. At that time, this book was only available in German. When I learned it had been reprinted in English, I was quick to request a copy and I was not disappointed with its contents.

Lapide does not question the fact of Jesus as a man who literally existed. He notes that apart from the testimony of several Jewish men, his reality is noted in both secular and Jewish literature of the day. Nor is Jesus’ crucifixion in question—as it was Rome’s punishment of choice in Jerusalem.

At issue is Jesus’ resurrection. Did it or did it not occur? Lapide is quick to state that this un-provable point is strictly a matter of faith. But faith not withstanding, Lapide makes a strong case that the theology of “resurrection” is Jewish through and through. As the Psalmist writes, “to God, the Lord, belongs escape from death” (Ps. 68:20).

Lapide does not shirk from the historical criticisms of the resurrection. The pagan similarities of Attis, Adonis, Isis and so forth have often been used to defend a resurrection “myth.” But these arguments present no challenge to Lapide. “The resurrection of Jesus can be proved—or refuted—only from Jewish sources since the Nazarene, both in his lifetime and after Good Friday, has ministered only within his homeland and his people Israel” (p. 46). This Talmudically reared scholar stridently asserts, “in whatever way one wants to understand [the resurrection], it was primarily and chiefly a Jewish faith experience” (pp 45-46). While Lapide never professes that Jesus is the Messiah of Israel, he makes it perfectly clear that the context of his resurrection fits within the overall framework and contemporary messianic expectation.

Pin It
Page 1 of 212

Tags: , , ,

Category: Living the Faith, Pneuma Review, Spring 2004

About the Author: Kevin M. Williams, Litt.D., H.L.D. has served in Messianic ministries since 1987 and has written numerous articles and been a featured speaker at regional and international conferences on Messianic Judaism.

  • Connect with

    Subscribe via Twitter Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), is the president-dean of Jakes Divinity School and associate pasto...

    Invitation: Stories about transformation

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Studies in Acts

    Daniel A. Brown, PhD, planted The Coastlands, a church near Santa Cruz, California, serving as Senior Pastor for 22 years. Daniel has authored four books and numerous articles, but h...

    Will I Still Be Me After Death?