Subscribe via RSS Feed

The Second Blessing of Spirit Baptism: British Reformation Roots of the Pentecostal Tradition

The belief that Christian conversion was followed by a “second blessing” experience originated with eighteenth century Anglican priest and founder of Methodism, John Wesley. As elaborated by Wesley and his associate, the English divine and apologist John Fletcher, this belief laid down much of the theological agenda for the nineteenth-century Holiness movement and the twentieth-century advent of Pentecostalism. Indeed, the reality of a further blessing of the fullness of the Christian life subsequent to conversion provided a theological context for the development of the Pentecostal “baptism in the Spirit.”

John Wesley

Wesley called attention to the inward, experiential dimension of faith. This emphasis was in part a reaction to the Calvinism that permeated the social and political life of the English world in the seventeenth century. Also undergirding the movement was the “living faith” Wesley imbibed from his encounter with German Pietism. Wesley’s contact with the Moravians, Pietists within eighteenth-century Lutheranism that drew from Catholic mysticism, gave him an awareness for the emotional dimension of faith. This led to his personal conversion, during which as he described, “I felt my heart strangely warmed.”[1] Wesley understood the Christian life as consisting of two separate experiences of grace—conversion (or justification), and Christian perfection (or sanctification). The first, justifying grace, covered over all the “actual sin” one had committed. Sanctifying grace, on the other hand, was given for the “residue” of sin that remained after one became a Christian—the inherited (original sin) from Adam.[2] According to Wesley, sanctifying grace occurred subsequent to the justifying grace of conversion. Wesley refers to the reality of this subsequent sanctifying experience as “Christian perfection,” “perfect love,” and “heart purity.”[3] While this experience is gradual and works itself out over the entirety of the Christian life, as Peter Althouse explains, there is also an instantaneous dimension of sanctification for Wesley. It is this latter “crisis” sense that undergirds the Holiness view of sanctification and the Pentecostal baptism in the Spirit.[4]

Come, Holy Ghost, my heart inspire!

attest that I am born again;

come, and baptize me now with fire.

Charles  Wesley

As Vinson Synan maintains, Fletcher was the first to call this second work of purifying grace the “baptism in the Holy Spirit.”[5] Both Wesley and Fletcher upheld that saving grace was possible for all that believed as the first and principle source of grace—only salvation based entirely on this grace had the power to save anyone from the reality of original sin.[6] Yet, clearly for both there was an experience of grace, beyond the pivotal moment of conversion, belonging to the fuller Christian life that must be sought in earnest. Both Wesley and Fletcher aligned this post-conversion experience with deliverance from sin and the restoration of the image of God. While they agreed on the significance of subsequent grace, they differed somewhat in how they articulated it.[7] Wesley’s emphasis was on perfection in love as the purification of sin. Fletcher preferred the language of “baptism in the Spirit.” He conveyed this in terms of spiritual empowerment, “What I want is the light and mighty power of the Spirit of God.”[8] For Fletcher, baptism in the “Pentecostal power of the Holy Ghost,” introduced a stage of the Christian life characterized by the activity of the Spirit.[9] According to Donald Dayton, this moved Methodist theology further from the Christocentric framework of Wesley and closer to the Pneumatocentric emphasis that came to characterize many Pentecostals.[10]

Pin It
Page 1 of 3123

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Category: Church History, Winter 2018

About the Author: Paul J. Palma, PhDc, is a Professor of Biblical Studies and Christian Ministry at Regent University and a Partner Correspondent at the Christian Broadcasting Network. Paul has authored or contributed to several books and has been published in a number of national and international journals. He and his wife, Gabrielle, have three children. For publications by Paul, visit his LinkedIn page. Facebook.

  • Connect with

    Subscribe via Twitter 1389 Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), was appointed as the founding dean of the Urban Renewal Center

    Symposium on the Holy Spirit and Theological Education 2019

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Gordon Fee: Jesus the Lord according to Paul the Apostle, reviewed by Craig S. Keener

    William L. De Arteaga, Ph.D., is known internationally as a Christian historian and expert on revivals and the rebirth and renewal of the Christian healing movement. His major w...

    Order of St. Luke International 2019: From an Anti-Cessationism past to a Fully Charismatic Future