Subscribe via RSS Feed

Review Essay, Keeping the Balance

Infallibility Another question that must be settled is this: given that all the Bible is inspired, is it all true? On the one hand, if the Bible isn’t infallible, “How may a book containing errors be the starting-point for our knowledge of God”? On the other hand, wouldn’t infallibility seriously detract from the “human” side of Scripture, which is evident,and which Christians maintain? Cameron now turns back to the previously suspended discussion of the origin of the Bible and the method by which it came to be written. There are two issues to note.

Firstly, to claim that the Bible is inspired is not to claim that it was dictated to a human typewriter. Claims about its origin and claims about the method of its production are not to be confused. Simply because the human writers were “consciously involved” in the composition of Scripture, but at the same time wrote down “precisely what God had intended that they should”, it does not follow that there was some high-handed “over-riding …of the personality of the human author. On the contrary, that very personality is the product of the careful preparation of the sovereign God”, who caused the right men in the right places at the right time with the right endowments and the right impulses to write books that He wanted to be written.

Secondly, it does not follow that “an infallible book, however produced [must] be a less than human work—because it is more than human”. To be fallible is not the same as actually making mistakes. The liability is not the same as the act. The fact that the Scriptures were written by humans does not prove that mistakes exist—it only proves that, in the absence of any other influence to prevent them, there might be. “But this corrective influence is supplied by the Divine element”.

Revelation Finally, if we grant that the Bible is inspired and inerrant, we have to consider its purpose before we try to theologise from it. “God ‘breathed out’ this collection of books” in order to reveal Himself, because humanity, through its fall, had lost its communion with God.

Pin It
Page 15 of 49« First...10...1314151617...203040...Last »

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Category: In Depth, Spring 2006

About the Author: W. Simpson, PhD (University of St. Andrews, Scotland), is a physicist and writer with an interest in theology, currently engaged in scientific research in the middle-east.

  • Connect with PneumaReview.com

    Subscribe via Twitter Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), is the president-dean of Jakes Divinity School and associate pasto...

    Invitation: Stories about transformation

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Studies in Acts

    Daniel A. Brown, PhD, planted The Coastlands, a church near Santa Cruz, California, serving as Senior Pastor for 22 years. Daniel has authored four books and numerous articles, but h...

    Will I Still Be Me After Death?