Subscribe via RSS Feed

Review Essay, Keeping the Balance

The theological scene The essay begins with a brief statement on the contemporary theological scene. To put it bluntly, it’s a mess! “Professors and lecturers seem to arrive at a dozen different conclusions about God”. But why? Cameron contends that this is because today’s theological thinkers are beginning from a “a dozen different premises” and allowing “different methods to determine the course and conclusions of their studies”. The critical flaw is their arbitrary and selective character; they are only man-made attempts to improve on biblical Christianity. However, finding God really pivots on performing the right theological method. It is through the God-revealed scriptures that we are provided with God’s own appointed means of coming to know Him. A proper use of this divine resource enables evangelicals to “do” theology in a way no-one else can; because if historic Christianity be true, they are doing it the way God intended”.

What does theological method mean? Cameron defines the phrase “theological method” as “the special procedure whereby the study of God is properly carried on”. Although “theology proper”, he reminds us, “isn’t the study of humanity’s thought about God; it is that only in so far as it enables the theologian to study God for Himself”. And God “can be studied only if he has made himself known”. Of course, “the foundation of Christian theology is that he has done so”, and the proper object of the theologian’s attention is that revelation.

Where do we start? At this point, there is a distinction to be drawn between God’s “general revelation” in nature and God’s “special revelation” in Scripture. For Christians, the “principle focus” of revelation is in the later. Cameron makes a brief excursus at this point to clear up any confusion about the position of Christ as the revelation of God and the function of Scripture as the means by which we are taught about God, arguing that we cannot know Christ apart from the Scriptures and there should be no epistemological split between them. The Bible, existing as a collection of prose and poetry, words and sentences, is the object of our study.

Pin It
Page 13 of 49« First...1112131415...203040...Last »

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Category: In Depth, Spring 2006

About the Author: W. Simpson, PhD (University of St. Andrews, Scotland), is a physicist and writer with an interest in theology, currently engaged in scientific research in the middle-east.

  • Connect with PneumaReview.com

    Subscribe via Twitter Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), is the president-dean of Jakes Divinity School and associate pasto...

    Invitation: Stories about transformation

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Studies in Acts

    Daniel A. Brown, PhD, planted The Coastlands, a church near Santa Cruz, California, serving as Senior Pastor for 22 years. Daniel has authored four books and numerous articles, but h...

    Will I Still Be Me After Death?