Subscribe via RSS Feed

Review Essay, Keeping the Balance

And herein lies the problem with some of the traditional arguments for God’s existence: “they treat God as though he were not a living, personal being to whom we are personally related, but as an object whose existence and nature is subject to disinterested scrutiny”. If we are going to understand people, Williams argues, it must be “within a certain context of relationships”, and the best context for understanding them is one of “willingness to learn and to serve, of humility and of love”. We find then that understanding involves “the disposition of the heart” as well as the function of the mind. Personal attitudes “can cloud or advance our understanding”. Consequently, we are justified in asking, “If there is a personal God, why should we believe that we can advance far in knowledge and understanding by purely intellectual processes?”

Of course, we haven’t yet resolved the question of whether or not there is a personal God, so is there really any point in talking about “attitudes of humility and so on in relation to the knowledge of God”? Williams replies with a resounding “yes”! For “according to the Christian witness, if the reality of God’s personal being comes in to view at any point, it is with the person of Jesus”. “If God is known supremely through Jesus, then we approach the knowledge of God by approaching Jesus”. This is the door that Christianity offers the world. It is here that we must knock. In knocking, we may find that there was nothing behind the door after all, but “this is certainly the direction in which we must now turn”.

Approaching Jesus as the way to approaching God Here is the logic, then: Jesus is said to reveal God. “Jesus was a person. He can be understood, if at all, only in the mode of personal knowledge. We have found that this is bound to require a certain disposition of the heart. It follows that if our enquiry about God takes the form of an enquiry about Jesus, it requires a certain disposition of the heart to conduct it aright”. Approaching Jesus is the next thing we must consider.

Pin It
Page 23 of 49« First...10...2122232425...3040...Last »

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Category: In Depth, Spring 2006

About the Author: W. Simpson, PhD (University of St. Andrews, Scotland), is a physicist and writer with an interest in theology, currently engaged in scientific research in the middle-east.

  • Connect with PneumaReview.com

    Subscribe via Twitter Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), is the president-dean of Jakes Divinity School and associate pasto...

    Invitation: Stories about transformation

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Studies in Acts

    Daniel A. Brown, PhD, planted The Coastlands, a church near Santa Cruz, California, serving as Senior Pastor for 22 years. Daniel has authored four books and numerous articles, but h...

    Will I Still Be Me After Death?