Subscribe via RSS Feed

Peter Enns: The Evolution of Adam

 

Peter Enns, The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn’t Say About Human Origins (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2012), 170 pages, ISBN 9781587433153.

Peter Enns brings his considerable academic training and writing ability to bear on the thorny subject of Scripture and evolution. He believes that the evidence for evolution is so overwhelming that Christians hurt the cause of Christianity by continuing to hold on to a literal (i.e. historical) reading of creation account in Genesis. In this regard, he echoes Augustine’s concerns. But rather than proffering a grand harmonization between evolution’s and Genesis’ account of origins, Enns addresses a single component that impedes progress towards a resolution, namely the historicity of Adam.

Enns recognizes that the task before him is great. He contends that the belief in an historical Adam flows not from a direct or plain reading of the scripture but from a cultural and theological reading of scripture, called an “interpretive reading.” An interpretive reading is where the tradition around a text becomes the meaning of the text even if the text doesn’t clearly state that reading. For example, consider the story of Advent. We are taught, and may even believe, that Joseph put Mary on a donkey for the journey from Nazareth to Bethlehem even though the bible says nothing about a donkey.

To break the grip that our ‘interpreted reading’ of Adam has on us, Enns endeavors to create cognitive dissonance in readers by methodically questioning the foundation supporting the interpreted reading. He begins by stating (and with very little reference to specifics or scholarship) that archeology and science provide so much evidence against an historical reading of Genesis that to ignore it would violate our commitment to common sense and grammatico-historical exegesis. Genesis, therefore, is not about cosmic history but about how Israel came into being. In turn, Adam is not the first human, he is the first Israelite, or proto-Israelite.

Enns recognizes that many theologians contend that Paul’s use of Adam (Rom 5; 1 Cor 15) demonstrates that Adam was a historical person. Enns responds that Paul’s use of Adam does not necessarily support the notion of an historical Adam because 1. His arguments were conditioned by the style of argumentation present in his day, 2. Paul’s style of argument is complex and not always easily followed, 3. We only know half the story because Paul’s writings were letters, 4. Paul often didn’t read the Old Testament plainly but rather through the lens of his encounter with Jesus Christ, and 5. Just because we jettison the notion of Adam as the first historical being doesn’t mean that Paul’s theological arguments fall too.

Pin It
Page 1 of 212

Tags: , , ,

Category: Biblical Studies, Spring 2014

About the Author: Stephen M. Vantassel, Ph.D. theology (Trinity Theological Seminary), M.A.T.S. Old Testament (Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary), B.S. Biblical Studies (Gordon College), is a Tutor of Theology at King’s Evangelical Divinity School in Broadstairs, U.K. and Assistant Editor for the Evangelical Review of Theology and Politics. His dissertation was published in expanded form in Dominion over Wildlife? An Environmental-Theology of Human-Wildlife Relations (Wipf and Stock, 2009), explains how biblical teaching on the use of animals provides a rubric for how God wants humanity to use the earth. He lives with his wife in Lewistown, Montana. He regularly posts articles at kingsdivinity.academia.edu/StephenMVantassel.

  • Connect with PneumaReview.com

    Subscribe via Twitter 1385 Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), was appointed as the founding dean of the Urban Renewal Center

    Symposium on the Holy Spirit and Theological Education 2019

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Gordon Fee: Jesus the Lord according to Paul the Apostle, reviewed by Craig S. Keener

    William L. De Arteaga, Ph.D., is known internationally as a Christian historian and expert on revivals and the rebirth and renewal of the Christian healing movement. His major w...

    Order of St. Luke International 2019: From an Anti-Cessationism past to a Fully Charismatic Future