The Place of the Holy Spirit in the Exegetical Process
The cold, dead, overly rationalistic methodology of the Enlightenment period spawned an existential hermeneutic desperately seeking for a faith that was alive, vibrant, and personal. We cannot fault the desires of these Romanticist exegetes, only their methodology that led to a nihilistic subjectivism.
V. Conclusion
What is needed, and what we have suggested all along, is a methodology that is critically sound and “experientially” alive. In order to accomplish this goal we must embrace the best of the grammatico-historical-syntactical method which is the reasonable use of our God-given capabilities. Likewise we must acknowledge our utter dependence on the Holy Spirit’s role in illuminating the Biblical text. Without His help the spiritual cravings of man will never be met. Critical methodology without the illumination of the Spirit in the final analysis is bankrupt and devoid of real significance.
“Those who engage in the task of interpreting the Bible must spare no effort to perfect their skills of exegesis.”
“We must acknowledge our utter dependence on the Holy Spirit’s role in illuminating the Biblical text.”
PR
Notes
1 For an Evangelical over-view of pertinent issues in inspiration and inerrancy see The Foundation of Biblical Authority, cited by J. M. Boice (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing Co., 1978).
2 Daniel P. Fuller, “The Holy Spirit’s Role in Biblical Interpretation.” in Scripture, Tradition and Interpretation, ed. by W. Ward Gasque and William Sanford LaSor, (Grand Rapids: Eerdman’s Publishing Co., 1978), p. 190.
Category: Biblical Studies, Winter 1999