Paul L. King: Hermeneutics in Modern and Classic Faith Movements
Hermeneutics and the Classic Faith Movement
In contrast with most contemporary faith teachers, the major classic faith teachers and their predecessors, by and large, had received a scholarly theological education, as was customary at the time. George Müller was a brilliant scholar, fluent in six languages, yet merged together scholarship and a vibrant faith. John Wesley, Andrew Murray, Thomas Upham, A.B. Simpson, Oswald Chambers, and R.A. Torrey were all seminary-educated and studied the classical languages, such as Greek, Hebrew, and Latin. Simpson won academic awards for his scholarship. Jonathan Edwards was president of Princeton in its early days. Charles Finney was trained in law. Torrey was highly educated as a graduate of Yale University and Yale Divinity School, and read the Bible in Greek, Hebrew, and German. Charles Blanchard served as president of Wheaton College. A.T. Pierson wrote a book on hermeneutics.
Before his death in 2003, Kenneth Hagin acknowledged there were problems with some prosperity teaching and emphasized the need for interpreting Scripture in its context.
Still, these classic faith leaders were not stodgy academics or ivory tower theologians who had little vital experience in a walk of faith. Rather, they walked close to God and practiced a life of daring faith, yet studied intensively, practically applied exegesis to life, and relied upon the Spirit to illuminate interpretation. Seminary-educated Murray counseled both the need for study and for revelation, saying, “As all the Word of God is given by the Spirit of God, each word must be interpreted to us by that same Spirit.”15 Simpson was concerned with grammatical-historical hermeneutics, but also perceived that God had provided much divine symbolism in Scripture: “It would be a great mistake to read the Bible only symbolically. But it is beautiful to see hidden truths beneath the history.”16 This is not to say that classic faith writers all had interpretations that would be accepted by scholarship today or that they would always agree with one another’s interpretations in all matters.
Category: Church History, Pneuma Review, Summer 2012