<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tongues and Other Miraculous Gifts in the Second Through Nineteenth Centuries, Part 1: From the Early Church to the 3rd Century, by Richard M. Riss</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pneumareview.com/tongues-and-other-miraculous-gifts1-rriss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pneumareview.com/tongues-and-other-miraculous-gifts1-rriss/</link>
	<description>Journal of Ministry Resources and Theology for Pentecostal and Charismatic Ministries &#38; Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wagers</title>
		<link>https://pneumareview.com/tongues-and-other-miraculous-gifts1-rriss/#comment-35308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Wagers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pneumareview.com/?p=1912#comment-35308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am grateful for the work that has been done here. This article is full of well researched information presented in an easy to read style. The only negative comment I would make is regarding the use of the verb &quot;prophesy&quot; when the context clearly calls for the use of the noun &quot;prophecy&quot;. I am confident that our brother knows the difference between the two and that this was most unlikely an editorial oversight. I suggest we correct it and blame spell check!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am grateful for the work that has been done here. This article is full of well researched information presented in an easy to read style. The only negative comment I would make is regarding the use of the verb &#8220;prophesy&#8221; when the context clearly calls for the use of the noun &#8220;prophecy&#8221;. I am confident that our brother knows the difference between the two and that this was most unlikely an editorial oversight. I suggest we correct it and blame spell check!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wagers</title>
		<link>https://pneumareview.com/tongues-and-other-miraculous-gifts1-rriss/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Wagers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pneumareview.com/?p=1912#comment-3237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am grateful for the work that has been done here. This article is full of well researched information presented in an easy to read style. The only negative comment I would make is regarding the use of the verb &quot;prophesy&quot; when the context clearly calls for the use of the noun &quot;prophecy&quot;. I am confident that our brother knows the difference between the two and that this was most unlikely an editorial oversight. I suggest we correct it and blame spell check!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am grateful for the work that has been done here. This article is full of well researched information presented in an easy to read style. The only negative comment I would make is regarding the use of the verb &quot;prophesy&quot; when the context clearly calls for the use of the noun &quot;prophecy&quot;. I am confident that our brother knows the difference between the two and that this was most unlikely an editorial oversight. I suggest we correct it and blame spell check!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
