<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Pneuma Review &#187; symbols</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pneumareview.com/tag/symbols/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pneumareview.com</link>
	<description>Journal of Ministry Resources and Theology for Pentecostal and Charismatic Ministries &#38; Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Robin M. Jensen: From Idols to Icons</title>
		<link>https://pneumareview.com/robin-m-jensen-from-idols-to-icons/</link>
		<comments>https://pneumareview.com/robin-m-jensen-from-idols-to-icons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 22:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Clevenger]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late antiquity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Jensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbols]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pneumareview.com/?p=18202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robin M. Jensen, From Idols to Icons: The Emergence of Christian Devotional Images in Late Antiquity, Christianity in Late Antiquity 12 (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2022), 252 pages, ISBN 9780520345423. Depending on what Christian tradition one finds oneself in, the question of Christian art is a difficult and delicate topic. Are we permitted [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://amzn.to/3TkW6CT"><img class="alignright" src="/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/RJensen-IdolsToIcons.jpg" alt="" width="180" /></a><strong>Robin M. Jensen, <em><a href="https://amzn.to/3TkW6CT">From Idols to Icons: The Emergence of Christian Devotional Images in Late Antiquity</a></em>, Christianity in Late Antiquity 12 (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2022), 252 pages, ISBN 9780520345423.</strong></p>
<p>Depending on what Christian tradition one finds oneself in, the question of Christian art is a difficult and delicate topic. Are we permitted to have Christian art? Can we represent Jesus? What disposition should we have towards artistic representations of Jesus, the apostles, or Christian saints? Does any of this break the Second Commandment? How and why did the Christian church eventually permit the use, and sometimes veneration, of Christian art? This book, <em><a href="https://amzn.to/3TkW6CT">From Idols to Icons: The Emergence of Christian Devotional Images in Late Antiquity</a></em> by Robin M. Jensen seeks to answer that last question. Jensen is a seasoned and respected scholar of early Christian art and one could not find a more able guide.</p>
<p><div class="simplePullQuote"><p><strong><em>What disposition should we have towards artistic representations of Jesus, the apostles, or Christian saints? Does any of this break the Second Commandment?</em></strong></p>
</div>Chapter one covers the earliest Christian critique of pagan idols in the second century. It boiled down to three criticisms: 1) the materiality of idols is contrary to God (i.e., wood decays; God does not), 2) the foolishness of worshiping lumps of clay (vs. worshiping God), and 3) the fact that these idols were attached to pagan gods (who were either nothing, so the idol was an empty sign, or the idol could be inhabited by a demon and so posed a real danger). In the first two objections, the early Christian critics of idols found a common cause with the philosophical critiques of Greco-Roman religious practices. Chapter two extends this discussion by addressing the invisibility of God. If God is invisible, how can God be visibly portrayed? More so, the Bible itself is full of images when talking about God. Are we, in the vein of Origen, Evagrius, and later with Theophilus in the anthropmorphite controversy, to seek “imageless” prayer? Jensen points out that this struggle is represented in how Christians would obliquely depict God the Father in their art by a hand coming from the clouds in heaven. Chapter three continues these threads by narrowing in on how early Christians wrestled with theophanies of God, specifically that of the Son. Does God revelation of himself in time and space permit us to represent that event?</p>
<p>Christians, Jensen shows in chapter four, most likely had artistic representations of some kind even as far back as the first century, only avoiding depictions of the Greco-Roman gods. When Christians began developing their own “material culture” by the third century, the artwork they commissioned was primarily narratival–depicting scenes from biblical stories–or symbolic. It was in the late fourth and early fifth centuries that the shift from narrative and symbol to <em>portraits</em> began to take place. With this shift also came, as explored in chapter five, debates about how to relate to such portraits of Christ or the saints. Were they vehicles facilitating a “face-to-face” encounters with the subject portrayed? By the fifth and sixth centuries, Christians felt they could honor such holy portraits while simultaneously distinguishing them from the person they represented. These debates naturally led to questions of how such connections between the subject and the portrait were possible (chapter six). Did it depend on the likeness between the subject and the portrait? Ultimately, the early Christians answered in the negative. As an aside, this chapter was the most interesting to me as she discusses and illustrates both the continuity and polymorphic representations of Christ in Christian art. Chapter seven rounds out the historical narrative of Jensen’s book by looking at the reported miracles associated with “holy portraits.”</p>
<p><div class="simplePullQuote"><p><strong><em>How did Christians move from seeing images as idols to icons?</em></strong></p>
</div>Jensen concludes her book with a chapter (eight) pulling all the historical threads together into a concise and helpful analysis that answers the question from which the book takes its title: how did Christians move from seeing images as idols to icons? For Jensen, the conceptual developments of the fourth century are key, specifically the concept of participation which Christian theologians adopted and adapted from Neoplatonism. It can be easy to see such influence as a corruption of the faith, but Jensen avoids such implications, and those familiar with the intellectual climate of the fourth century are aware of how nuanced such appropriation actually was. Participation bridges the material and spiritual worlds; it connects vertically, if you will, our life on earth with the life in heaven, not in and of itself, but grounded in the incarnation of Christ. With these concepts in place and the shift from narrative to portraits, “icons” finally became possible.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of this book is its brevity (excluding endnotes, the book is only 169 pages). Profound brevity is the mark of a true expert, and Jensen shows herself as such. The book is filled with many fascinating examples of early Christian art that Jensen expertly weaves into her narrative. Coming in at a list price is $65 (USD), which may be cost-prohibitive for some, one hopes a cheaper paperback volume will make this excellent work more widely available.</p>
<p><em>Reviewed by Ryan Clevenger</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>Publisher’s page: <a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/books/from-idols-to-icons/hardcover">https://www.ucpress.edu/books/from-idols-to-icons/hardcover</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://pneumareview.com/robin-m-jensen-from-idols-to-icons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biblical Imagery: The Metaphorical Symbols of the Holy Spirit</title>
		<link>https://pneumareview.com/biblical-imagery-the-metaphorical-symbols-of-the-holy-spirit/</link>
		<comments>https://pneumareview.com/biblical-imagery-the-metaphorical-symbols-of-the-holy-spirit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Archer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biblical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphorical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbols]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pneumareview.com/?p=4095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christian theology should always be concerned to speak about God on the basis of God’s self-communication in Christ Jesus and the Holy Spirit. God comes to us in Christ Jesus through the power and personal presence of the Holy Spirit. God exists in differentiated personhood. Thus relationality is an essential attribute of God’s very being—a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian theology should always be concerned to speak about God on the basis of God’s self-communication in Christ Jesus and the Holy Spirit. God comes to us in Christ Jesus through the power and personal presence of the Holy Spirit. God exists in differentiated personhood. Thus relationality is an essential attribute of God’s very being—a loving relational community. God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Thus, God is Spirit and has a Spirit.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://pneumareview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/dove-smallflight.jpg" alt="" width="244" height="176" />This essay will examine some of the more prominent biblical imagery associated with the incorporeal and invisible Holy Spirit. The biblical imagery employed is to be understood from a metaphorical symbolic perspective. These metaphorical symbols are not simple flat literal empirical descriptions of the Spirit but are powerful metaphorical symbols, which open up the mysterious and hidden work of the Spirit to us. From this perspective, these symbols help us apprehend and experience the invisible and ontological otherness of God</p>
<p>The biblical images of the Holy Spirit are tangible means that convey the character and activity of the Holy Spirit to us. These images enable us to experientially know the personal presence and power of the invisible and incorporeal Living God. These scriptural symbols testify to the ways in which the people of God have experienced the Holy Spirit throughout history. The invisible Spirit communicates to us by means of our human senses. We hear and feel the Spirit of God, just as they did! God then condescends to us through human avenues so that we can experience God. The symbols provide us with analogies so that we can understand the working of God. This is a redemptive knowledge of God. It is God who reveals Himself to us.</p>
<p><div class="simplePullQuote"><p><b><i>God comes to us in Christ Jesus through the power and personal presence of the Holy Spirit.</i></b></p>
</div>We know that the Holy Spirit is not literally a dove, or fire, or wind, or water or a cloud but these biblical symbols do signify real aspects of the Spirit’s presence and work. These are symbols, which we experience: the force of an unexpected wind, breathing, the instincts of a gentle dove, the purging energy of fire, the comfort and pleasant fragrance of oil. It is important for me to state again that these symbols do signify the real presence of the Spirit, thus they are not simply similes such as The Spirit is like a fire, nor are they empirical literal descriptions the Spirit is the fire, but they are symbolic metaphors which convey the presence and power of the Spirit.</p>
<p>The biblical symbols enable us to relationally and experientially understand the mysterious work of the Spirit. The metaphorical symbols convey the presence of the Spirit in such a way as those who encounter the symbol experience the reality of the Spirit. The Lord has chosen these particular symbols as a way for us to experientially recognize the presence of God in our lives.</p>
<p>Scripture, then, provides us with an authoritative narrative to validate our experiences. If our experience does not line up with Scripture then we need to prayerfully reconsider the authenticity of our experience. The Spirit who breathed upon the writers of the Bible is still breathing upon the people of God. We should expect God to encounter us and even more so as we the people of God long for God’s Spirit to be poured out afresh upon us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://pneumareview.com/biblical-imagery-the-metaphorical-symbols-of-the-holy-spirit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
