This year’s CLF began with an introductory sermon by Pastor Scott Kelso, author of several notable charismatic books.  His theme was that Deut. 4, is a recap of the Old Testament – Love God, be obedient to the Law, and avoid idolatry. Pastor Kelso pointed out that this was the book of the Bible most cited by our nation’s Founding Fathers.

The first formal session of the conference was delivered by Dr. John Gresham, retired seminary professor (Kenrick-Glennon Seminary in St Louis).  Dr. Gresham came to faith in the California “Jesus’ People” movement and eventually migrated from Pentecostalism to Charismatic Catholic in his beliefs. His presentation was entitled, “What the Early Church did right.” In his view, the Church’s careful attention to discipling was a key to its survival and growth under persecution. Early Christians usually underwent a three-year period of instruction and deliverance ministry before they were baptized. This produced Christians who were discipled and not just converted.

Sessions 2 and 3 were presented by Dr. Dan Keating, seminary professor and Fellow of the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology. His objective was to explain the process and importance of the Council of Nicaea. His noted that the creeds are “medicine” against today’s modernist tendencies to relativism and fluid doctrine. His detailed description of the Council was a revelation to most of us. What we call the Nicene Creed was formed in two stages. The original draft was forged in 325 A.D. to counter the heresy of Arius, a priest in Alexandria, who taught that Jesus was a created being (i.e., not God). This draft was short, and included a mention of the Holy Spirit, affirming that the Spirit too was God.  But Arianism continued to spread, and in 381 A.D. a second council added clarifying statement to flesh out the Creed as we know it today.[1]

Session 4 was by Anthony Martini, a member of Faith Village which forms the core of the Alleluia Covenant Community. Martini gained a master’s of sacred theology from the Collegium Augustinianum. His presentation was on the Church before Nicaea.  He showed from the earliest writers that Church organization and theology was fluid in the first century, but by the Third century had arrived at a “proto-Catholic” consensus. This was due, according to Martine, to the influence of St. Paul as well such pivotal writers as Polycarp and Clement.

The next lecture was given by Dr. Timothy Cremeens, a priest in the Orthodox Church of North America. Fr. Cremeens has been a regular attendee at the CLF for a decade, and has at different times described the difficult road that the Pentecostal/charismatic movement has in establishing itself in traditional Orthodoxy. This time he showed how the Orthodox churches have not changed their theological or doctrinal prospectives from the time of Nicaea. He explained how Orthodox clergy sees the non-Orthodox world as one of chaos, as it flounders in Protestant liberalism and other modernist heresies.

Session 8 was led by a lay Catholic woman Mrs. Kim Catherine-Marie Kollins.  She has been European coordinator between Catholic and Protestant charismatic groups for over four decades. She told the story of how difficult inter-faith cooperation was when she started her work, and how now it has come into a fullness and ease of cooperation that few would have expected in the 20^th century.

The last information session was led by Dr. Richard Roberts, from Dorset, England. Trained as a physician, Dr. Roberts developed an interest in Celtic Christianity.  His talk began by describing the woeful plight of the churches in the UK.  Only about 7% of the population go to church on Sunday. Yet there are areas of revival, as manifested in the African, especially Nigerian, congregations in London and other parts of the UK, and which are influencing many other churches.

Dr. Roberts’ focus turned to the question of what sort of leadership is needed to bring revival in the UK.  He suggested looking that Celtic Christianity and its founder, St. Patrick. The scriptural context is Rom. 5: 3-5 – suffering for Christ. Here St. Partick’s life and marvelously effective ministry demonstrates the point.  St. Partick was kidnapped out of an aristocratic family in Wales, suffered severe privation as a slave in Ireland, escaped, but returned as bishop-missionary to his land of captivity.

Besides the excellent praise interludes before every session, the conference was interspaced by two sessions of ministry. One was a period of prophecy and praying for one another. Another was a discussion of exorcism and deliverance. This was led by Chuck Hornsby and Bob Garrett, the former an experienced deliverance minister, and the latter the coordinator of the Alleluia Community. The team discussed the ministry of deliverance and exorcism as it pertained to Catholics and Protestants. We were then broken up into small groups to clear up any personal deliverance issues we had. This seems improbable. Why would charismatic and Pentecostal leaders need deliverance ministry? Actually, yes: the demonic attacks with special vehemence all Christian leaders. Often this results in areas of demonic infestations even among the most effective and sincere leaders. This manifests publicly when scandal breaks out, as when a famous leader is exposed for long-standing sexual or financial failures.

This year’s conference was one of the best I have attended. As always, the fellowship was a blessing, as was the hospitality of the Alleluia community. But the goal of the conference, reminding us of the orthodox resources of the Early Church was well met. I believe that many of the participants left with a better understanding of how the struggles of the early church can inform and strengthen the present Christian struggle against the various forms of heresy and weak faith that afflict many denominations.

Next year’s conference will be held at the same place, on Feb. 23-26.  If you are a church leader or elder and wish to come to next years’ meeting, contact Bob Garrett at, bobg@yeslord.com

PR

Notes

[1] Making creeds is something like making sausages, something to be celebrated but not nice to see. For a splendid and engrossing account of how Orthodoxy triumphed over Arianism see Philip Jenkins’ work, The Jesus Wars (New York; Harper Collins, 2010).

This year’s topic of the CLF was to be “Flooding the Darkness with Light.” Several of the speakers and discussions strayed out of topic and centered on the issue of Church unity and ecumenism, a fine topic indeed, but one covered last year. Left uncovered was any mention of spiritual warfare – which most certainly will be the theme of next year’s CLF meeting.

The woman playing the violin is Ladonna Taylor, who has a special anointing in her music.

Two speakers were especially instrumental in shaping the course of the meeting and acting as vehicles of the Holy Spirit. The first was the Rev. Carolyn Moore. She is a Methodist pastor who has led the exodus of many orthodox Methodist churches out of the United Methodist Church and into the Global Methodist Church. Her presentation of the separation from the UMC especially touched me as I, as a former Episcopalian, was forced to tread the same route into the (orthodox) Anglican Church in North America.

Moore’s presentation was pertinent to many in the Church today. She described the decline and division of the UMC as the result of the ascendancy of Liberal theology which at its root denies the divinity of Jesus and the trustworthiness of scripture. For those embracing this movement, pluralism and inclusivity became more important concepts than upholding the unique claims of Jesus as the Son of God and Savior and other doctrines essential to Christianity. A great insight she shared was that ecumenical dialogue is good for the Church, as Christians get to understand and appreciate Christians in other denominations, but pluralism crosses the line into heresy by claiming that all viewpoints are equal and thus truth is unobtainable. This happened to the UMC (and to the Episcopal Church decades earlier).

Praying over Rabbi Marty

The second speaker and the one who made the greatest impact was Rabbi Marty Waldman. He refuses to call himself a Christian, rather he calls himself a Messianic Jew – a true Jew who believes in Jesus as his Messiah and the New Testament as part of the Word of God.

If you are a Christian leader of any stripe, pastor, youth leader, blogger, etc. make plans to attend next year’s CLF. They are held in late February, but check out the CLF website at CharismaticLeadersFellowship.org

Attendees for the CLF came from all over North America and many parts of the world. This year there was a heavy presence of Polish charismatics as well as the usual Brazilians and Italians. It is always a joy to fellowship with these beloved “foreigners” who are brothers and sisters in Christ. I would not be telling readers anything new if I said it is easier talking and enjoying fellowship with a Polish charismatic with a heavy accent, than an unsaved American neighbor.

In a sense “receptive ecumenism” has been going on for quite some time without having a name. I can think of the loving atmosphere of the Full Gospel Businessmen Fellowship International, begun way back in the 1950s be Demos Shakarian. This group was a pre-cursor to the Charismatic Renewal, i.e., mainline Protestants accepting Pentecostal practices.[2] The bond of love and service of this group was not in the least disturbed by its multidenominational membership. Similarly, a half century of ecumenical cooperation to overturn Roe Vs. Wade in various pro-life groups, local and national, led to Protestants of all denomination mingling, cooperating, and loving Catholics – and visa versa. “Receptive ecumenism” was not the primary intention of these groups, but the (providential) result of their meeting together with common goals.

This is not to say that the CLF meeting was redundant. Good theology identifies and solidifies biblical truths, attitudes, and practices. For instance, bad or absent theology on the gifts of the Holy Spirit prevented Pentecostalism and Spirit-filled churches from forming for centuries even though many Christians spoke in tongues and individually practiced the gifts of the Spirit all through Church history.[3] The flourishing of the gifts of the Spirit in whole congregations had to wait for theologies that explained the gifts and manifestations of the Spirit. All of which is to say, formulating a theology of receptive ecumenism is important for it to further flourish.

The first speaker (session 1) the Rev. Pat Sparrow, made a starting affirmation that receptive ecumenism was the way to fulfill Jesus’ prayer in John 17 that we should all be one. The stumbling point is that most churches interested in ecumenism believe they are the model to show the way forward.

Session 2 was a joint presentation by Dr. David Cole and Mr. Nathan Smith, both heavily involved in Rome with Catholic-Pentecostal reconciliation and dialogue. They reflected that half a century of dialogue produced some progress in raising the respect level for one another. But a new attitude of humility and listening is permeating the situation, and this has resulted in Catholics and Pentecostals praying together, something unheard of decades ago.

Fr. Jim Puglisi brought an interesting historical perspective to the conference in the next session. His talk centered on the Syriac church (important in the Early Church). He pointed out that the Syriac Church valued greatly the Apostle James, brother of Jesus, and the tradition of community as the basis of unity. This is different from the Western church which early on valued Greek philosophy and “right theology” as the basis of unity. This of course led to the bitter division between the Western churches and the Oriental Orthodox churches.[4]

The next two presenters brought further historical perspective to ecumenicism. Fr. Timothy Cremeens talked about the lack of ecumenicism in the early church, as any deviation from established orthodoxy was considered as heresy – no dialogue possible. (Fr. Cremeens is one of the best loved regulars of the CLF. He is rector of an American Orthodox Church and is very charismatic. But his denomination does not look favorably on the gifts of the Spirit today. He soldiers onward.) Anthony Martin then gave us a brief history of the Reformation, and what went wrong to result in wars instead of dialogue between Protestants and Catholics.

Fr. Karol Sobczyk was the speaker for the next session (session 8). He presented a history of the Charismatic movement in Poland where the population is over 90% Catholic. In spite of this, he credited the mission of John Wimber decades ago in Poland for being a major impetus of the charismatic renewal, which is growing day by day.

Scott Kelso, who is the coordinator of the CLF, and very active in the ecumenical movement worldwide, gave an interesting take on how important prophecy is for the ecumenical movement. It moves persons out of their comfort zones and into obedience with God’s will, which is ultimately the unity of the Church. In the next session Dr. John Gresham gave us information about the origins of the term “receptive ecumenism.” It was coined by Dr. Paul Murray of the university of Durham. He organized the first meeting on the topic, and later published a book on it.[5] Gresham suggested several other seminal sources of receptive ecumenism.[6]

The next presentation was by two persons, a layman, Isias Carniero and Bishop Rodolfo Valenzuela, described the ongoing successes of ecumenism in Latin America. Brazil is an especially great example, and this year celebrates 50 years of dialogue and ecumenism between Evangelical and Catholics. For those of us like myself, who were born into pre-Vatican II Catholicism, this is a miraculous change. Well into the 1960s, Protestant missionaries in various parts of Latin America were harassed and even murdered by Catholic vigilantes who believed they were protecting the true faith.

At noon the attendees were bussed to Ascension Lutheran Church for an Ash Wednesday service. After lunch there were presentations by leaders of two covenant communities, Word of Christ and Alleluia, both describing how they managed and lived out their receptive ecumenism. Both communities were predominantly Catholic but Catholics in these communities cherished what they had learned from their Protestant brothers and sisters. Especially in the early days of the 1970s, the classic works of the Pentecostal and Charismatic renewal such as the Cross and the Switchblade by David Wilkerson, and the cassettes of Derek Prince were seminal.

After dinner on Tuesday, there was a reception at an outdoor fire pit with several other Christian groups who were also present at the Alleluia community – alas, without marshmallows. The next morning opened with a powerful prayer and praise session which became a healing service. Many healings occurred and I personally received a healing for my hearing. This was followed by the last session, and my favorite.

The Catholic Bishop of Portland, Oregon, Peter Smith, spoke. He is noted for his orthodox theology and charismatic beliefs, and he jokingly introduced himself as the bishop of the “People’s Republic of Portland.” He noted that he created a rumpus in Oregon when he mandated that children in Catholic schools under his jurisdiction must be addressed by their birth names. What surprised me especially was his comment that when he hears confessions, he often says prayers of deliverance over the supplicant. This is a situation where deliverance prayer can be very effective, especially in sins of addiction.

The 2023 CLF was a great conference, and if you have a leadership position in any church or para-church organization, please join us next year.

PR

Notes

[1] For a better description of the CLF and the Alleluia community, see posting of the 2020 CLF in The Pneuma Review (March 30, 2020). /charismatic-leaders-fellowship-2020/

[2] William De Arteaga, Marvels and Signs: Quintessential Essays From an Anglican Pentecostal (Lee’s Summit: Christos, 2022) chapter 10, “Did the Charismatic Renewal Begin in 1950?”

[3] See Judith Tydings, Gathering a People (Plainfield; Logos International, 1977).

[4] On this tragic division see the work of Philip Jenkins, Jesus Wars: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, and Two Emperors Decided What Christians Would Believe for the Next 1,500 Years (New York; HarperCollins, 2010).

[5] Paul Murray, Receptive Ecumenism as Transformative Ecclesial Learning (Oxford: Oxford University, 2022).

[6] See Andrew Wilson, Spirit and a Sacrament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2018). [Editor’s Note: See the review by Rick Wadholm Jr.]