Subscribe via RSS Feed

Spreading from the Frontiers: Another Look at the Gospel in the Medieval Church

A page from The Book of Armagh.
Image: Wikimedia Commons

Two other re-appraisals are in order. The first of these is the Monastic movement which arose in the first half of the fourth century under Antony and Pachomius and came into its own in the fifth and sixth centuries. The other appraisal relates to the so-called Crusades. The Monastic movement has occasionally been criticized for moving away from the missionary imperative of the Church for a purer Christian life unspotted by the world’s temptations. Nothing could further from the truth as the monasteries became training grounds for the mission field. No one had a greater impact upon the outreach of the monasteries of the Western Church than John Cassian. The monasteries of Armagh in Ireland and Iona in Scotland trained those who re-evangelized Europe after the Gothic and Vandal invasions and the names of those evangelists are well-known, men as Patrick and Boniface and Augustine of Canterbury. Though the monasteries of the Orthodox Churches in the East were more of a contemplative nature, men as Basil the Great turned many of the monasteries into hospitals for the sick and infirmed, homes for the aged, and hostels for travelers. Both in the East and in the West, the monasteries also had their scriptorium in which the Bible was laboriously translated out of the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek into Latin and into the indigenous languages of eastern Europe and of Africa. It was the Latin language which made the Western Church catholic. The Church in the West encouraged a catholic language, that is a language that was universally spoken throughout western Europe. The Church in the East encouraged translating the Bible into the indigenous languages of the peoples of eastern Europe, Egypt, Ethiopia, and of Asia. The labor of the monks, East and West, brought the Word of God into the languages of the peoples.

The labor of the monks, East and West, brought the Word of God into the languages of the peoples.

The Crusades, as popularized by John Julian Norwich, and other writers on the era is considered an initiated and aggressive action against the Moslem world. In reality it was a defensive action, several years overdue. Initiated yes but undertaken after the Arab invasion of not only Iran but also, turning westward invaded the entire Near East and then into the entirety of North Africa to the Atlantic Ocean and then across the strait of Gibraltar into the Iberian peninsula (modern Spain and Portugal). The forces of Charles Martel about A.D. 720, kept the caliphate armies out of southern France by a stunning defeat. Whole towns were massacred along the way from Persia to Morocco and into southern Spain. The Christians along the Caspian sea, the Himyarite Arab Christians, and in Egypt fled into the mountains (Kurdistan range, the Great Rift mountains of northern Arabia, the Great Rift valley of Ethiopia, and the Atlas mountains and deserts of North Africa.

By the time of the Crusades, the Arab themselves were on the defensive against the invading Seljuk Turks, and by 1070 the Seljuks already took over the Holy Land from the Fatimid caliph of Egypt. In A.D. 1095 Pope Urban II decided that it was time to end the Arab-Turkic Moslem dominance of the Middle-East and of the Holy Land in particular. The Council of Claremont gave their stamp of approval. In 1096 the enrollment of armies began all across western Europe to throw back the menace of the Moslems, be they Turks or Arabs. By 1098 both Edessa and Antioch had fallen to the crusaders. The following year Jerusalem fell under the Christian rule of Godfrey of Bouillon. Not all crusade leaders through the years acted like “Christians.” Several were barbaric in their actions but no more so than were the Moslems. Between 1099 and 1281, there were sparks of hope and many more sparks and flames of horrible actions. Several of the leaders of the crusading western armies were but nominal and “window-dressing” Christians in their actions which not only tarnished but soiled the Christian faith in the eyes of the conquered peoples and especially in the eyes of the Christians in the Balkan countries of Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Macedonia, when the fourth crusade decided to steer away from the Near East and attacked Constantinople, the capital of Orthodox Christianity. The action rocked the Christian world and drove a wedge between the Christian West and the Christian East because of the lust of the leaders to steal the wealth of the Byzantine capital. Constantinople was the wealthiest and most ornate capital city in all of Europe by virtue of its site as the entrepot of all the trade routes, maritime and overland which ended and began from there.

During the Crusades, there were sparks of hope and many more sparks and flames of horrible actions.

There were, however, Christians from the western world which worked toward amending and eradicating the enmities caused. Among them were Ramon Lull, who spent his life within the Moslem world and died there as a martyr. There were also the Coptic Christians within Moslem Egypt, the Amharic Christians in the fastness of Ethiopia, and the Nubian Christians in the southern Sudan, who in their secluded conclaves, helped to ameliorate the animosities engendered by the European crusaders. In fact, part of the reason for the crusades – besides that of the Moslem conquest which pulled a curtain down between the Christian West and the Christian East – were reports which were brought into western Europe by merchants coming out of West Asia and elsewhere of Christians locked out of contact with the western world. One of these travelers was Cosimo Indicopleustes who arrived back into Europe with a report of Christians along the west coast of India – The St. Thomas (Mar Thoma) Christians and of Christians in Trapobane (modern Sri Lanka). There were also stories of a Prester, or Presbyter, John, a leader or bishop of Christians living in Ethiopia. There was also a Nestorian envoy from East Asia who traveled along the Silk Road, crossed over into southeastern Europe, and came to Rome and visited the pope. There were, in fact, Christians behind the Moslem “Silken Curtain.” There were good reason for the Crusades, despite the terrible outcome perpetrated by the Fourth Crusade.

Pin It
Page 2 of 3123

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Church History, Spring 2017

About the Author: Woodrow E. Walton, D.Min. (Oral Roberts University School of Theology and Missions), B.A. (Texas Christian University), B.D. [M.Div.] (Duke Divinity School), M.A. (University of Oklahoma), is a retired Seminary Dean and Professor of biblical, theological and historical studies. An ordained Assemblies of God minister, he and his wife live in Fort Worth, Texas. Walton retains membership with the Evangelical Theological Society, American Association of Christian Counselors, American Society of Church History, American Academy of Political Science, and The International Society of Frontier Missiology.

  • Connect with

    Subscribe via Twitter Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), is the president-dean of Jakes Divinity School and associate pasto...

    Invitation: Stories about transformation

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Studies in Acts

    Daniel A. Brown, PhD, planted The Coastlands, a church near Santa Cruz, California, serving as Senior Pastor for 22 years. Daniel has authored four books and numerous articles, but h...

    Will I Still Be Me After Death?