<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Giles: The Eternal Generation of the Son</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pneumareview.com/kevin-giles-the-eternal-generation-of-the-son/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pneumareview.com/kevin-giles-the-eternal-generation-of-the-son/</link>
	<description>Journal of Ministry Resources and Theology for Pentecostal and Charismatic Ministries &#38; Leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pneuma Review</title>
		<link>https://pneumareview.com/kevin-giles-the-eternal-generation-of-the-son/#comment-35892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pneuma Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pneumareview.com/?p=6572#comment-35892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C.H. on the Pentecostal Theology Facebook page wrote: &quot;I affirm the eternal existence of the Triune God, and the eternal interrelations between the person of the trinity. Albeit, I have difficulty with the terminology &#039;eternal generation&#039; and &#039;eternal Sonship&#039;. I know what they are meant to imply historically, but prima facia the terms are non congruent.

&quot;While I hesitate to say it, for fear of being misunderstood and mislabeled, I rather find the terminology &#039;incarnational Sonship&#039; to be much more accurate. Again, I affirm the preexistence of Christ and his eternal divinity as part of the triune God.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.H. on the Pentecostal Theology Facebook page wrote: &#8220;I affirm the eternal existence of the Triune God, and the eternal interrelations between the person of the trinity. Albeit, I have difficulty with the terminology &#8216;eternal generation&#8217; and &#8216;eternal Sonship&#8217;. I know what they are meant to imply historically, but prima facia the terms are non congruent.</p>
<p>&#8220;While I hesitate to say it, for fear of being misunderstood and mislabeled, I rather find the terminology &#8216;incarnational Sonship&#8217; to be much more accurate. Again, I affirm the preexistence of Christ and his eternal divinity as part of the triune God.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pneuma Review</title>
		<link>https://pneumareview.com/kevin-giles-the-eternal-generation-of-the-son/#comment-35893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pneuma Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 16:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pneumareview.com/?p=6572#comment-35893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[C.H. on the Pentecostal Theology Facebook page wrote: &quot;I affirm the eternal existence of the Triune God, and the eternal interrelations between the person of the trinity. Albeit, I have difficulty with the terminology &#039;eternal generation&#039; and &#039;eternal Sonship&#039;. I know what they are meant to imply historically, but prima facia the terms are non congruent.

&quot;While I hesitate to say it, for fear of being misunderstood and mislabeled, I rather find the terminology &#039;incarnational Sonship&#039; to be much more accurate. Again, I affirm the preexistence of Christ and his eternal divinity as part of the triune God.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C.H. on the Pentecostal Theology Facebook page wrote: &#8220;I affirm the eternal existence of the Triune God, and the eternal interrelations between the person of the trinity. Albeit, I have difficulty with the terminology &#8216;eternal generation&#8217; and &#8216;eternal Sonship&#8217;. I know what they are meant to imply historically, but prima facia the terms are non congruent.</p>
<p>&#8220;While I hesitate to say it, for fear of being misunderstood and mislabeled, I rather find the terminology &#8216;incarnational Sonship&#8217; to be much more accurate. Again, I affirm the preexistence of Christ and his eternal divinity as part of the triune God.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
