Subscribe via RSS Feed

Review Essay, Keeping the Balance

Cupples goes on to consider the implication of “a spirituality where the mind is partly disengaged, or even despised”. His conclusion is that it is dishonouring to God, who gave us our minds; disobedient to Christ, who commanded us to love God with the mind; dehumanising for men and women, whose ability to reason is an important aspect of the image of God in them; and destructive of a Christian world-view, which “seeks to unite all the phenomena of experience into a coherent and consistent overall interpretation of reality”. This division of reality into two autonomous realms—reason and religion—basically denies the doctrine of creation “which demands that all things must be related to God their Maker and therefore to each other”. It reduces faith to “an irrational leap into a religious experience, a step into the dark rather than into the light”. It divides faith and history too, preventing the gospel from saying anything meaningful about the later, “when in fact there is nothing more central in the whole biblical message”. Another consequence of this position is that biblical language is emptied of its objective content. In short, segregation is not an option for Christians. Authentic Christianity “involves us in a relationship to God’s work in history and to the truth revealed about life in God’s Word”. “Personal salvation, and love for God, are rightly understood only in this wider setting of Christ’s Lordship over all aspects of life”.

4. Integration Integration “seeks to find a way of harmonizing our academic and devotional reading of Scripture”, offering “a perspective in which they are complementary aspects of a consistent attitude toward Scripture as the Word of God”, uniting “mind and heart, theology and experience, life and learning in a vision of the commitment of the whole person to Christ”. This, Cupples contends, is the only response that is biblically sound, intellectually honest, and spiritually healthy. The remainder of his essay is devoted to “expounding the way of integration”.

Devotional and academic study placed in perspective If devotional and academic study of the Bible are to be integrated, Cupples must find their common ground. And since he does not plan on ditching both terms and reducing them into more or less the same thing, he must also identify acceptable differences between them.

Pin It
Page 31 of 49« First...1020...2930313233...40...Last »

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Category: In Depth, Spring 2006

About the Author: W. Simpson, PhD (University of St. Andrews, Scotland), is a physicist and writer with an interest in theology, currently engaged in scientific research in the middle-east.

  • Connect with PneumaReview.com

    Subscribe via Twitter 1385 Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), was appointed as the founding dean of the Urban Renewal Center

    Symposium on the Holy Spirit and Theological Education 2019

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Gordon Fee: Jesus the Lord according to Paul the Apostle, reviewed by Craig S. Keener

    William L. De Arteaga, Ph.D., is known internationally as a Christian historian and expert on revivals and the rebirth and renewal of the Christian healing movement. His major w...

    Order of St. Luke International 2019: From an Anti-Cessationism past to a Fully Charismatic Future