Subscribe via RSS Feed

Praying in the Spirit: Just What Is the Nature of the Prayer Language?

A similar argument is based on I Corinthians 14:21: “In the Law it is written: ‘Through men of strange tongues and through the lips of foreigners I will speak to this people, but even then they will not listen to me,’ says the Lord.” Here, also, Paul uses a different word than he has been using to refer to tongues. The anti-charismatic position, however, asks us to see a definite parallel between tongues-speaking and Paul’s reference to Isaiah 28:11-12. The problem is apparent: carried to its logical conclusion, such a view mandates that tongues be of the Assyrian dialect spoken by native Assyrians! Obviously, Paul’s reference is to be understood in a more general sense.

Numerous non-Pentecostal New Testament scholars and commentaries reject the view that tongues in the New Testament were always foreign languages.

Anti-charismatic John F. MacArthur, Jr., argues that in 1 Corinthians 12:10, 28 Paul prefaces the word tongues with a word (kinds or families of tongues) that indicates he was speaking specifically of foreign languages (p. 160). This is doubtful since, in this context, the word Paul uses for kinds of tongues (genos) may refer to the unlimited languages of the soul or  different kinds of prayers (see 1 Cor. 14:10). The reference might include celestial or heavenly languages as well. Non-Pentecostals Plummer and Robertson say that kinds simply “indicates that the manifestations of this gift varied much” (p. 267). And MacArthur asks us to believe that Paul was thinking of not just individual foreign languages but families of foreign languages, such as Semitic, Indo-Germanic, or Turanian. The argument seems a bit farfetched (Godet, p. 630). Paul’s use of phÇn (sounds, or KJV voices) with genos in 1 Corinthians 14:10 also speaks against MacArthur’s exegesis.

Nowhere does Scripture mandate that tongues-speaking must be a foreign language. There are indications, however, that the nature of tongues is unintelligible, transcendent, and without natural counterpart. Certain verses in 1 Corinthians 14 simply make better sense if tongues are understood in this way. For example, 1 Corinthians 14:2: “Anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. Indeed, no one understands him; he utters mysteries with his spirit.” Without divine intervention, in other words, no one can understand an utterance in tongues. Yet if it were a foreign language, would not the utterance be recognizable by native speakers? “The interpretation of tongues demands a special gift of the Spirit … not a nationality” (Goudge, p. 134).

Additionally, non-Pentecostal C. R. Smith notes that the foreign language interpretation of this verse (“For anyone who speaks in a language does not speak to men…”) is contradictory, since “speaking to men” is what human language is for. On the other hand, the Pentecostal-charismatic (and the majority of non-Pentecostal) interpretation of this verse (“For anyone who speaks in a spiritual language speaks not to men but to God”) is not contradictory, but reasonable (p. 31).

Pin It
Page 7 of 9« First...56789

Tags: , , , ,

Category: Fall 1999, Spirit

About the Author: Robert W. Graves, M. A. (Literary Studies, Georgia State University), is the co-founder and president of The Foundation for Pentecostal Scholarship, Inc., a non-profit organization supporting Pentecostal scholarship through research grants. He is a Christian educator and a former faculty member of Southwestern Assemblies of God College in Waxahachie, Texas, and Kennesaw State University (adjunct). He edited and contributed to Strangers to Fire: When Tradition Trumps Scripture and is the author of Increasing Your Theological Vocabulary, Praying in the Spirit (1987 and Second Edition, 2017) and The Gospel According to Angels (Chosen Books, 1998).

  • Connect with

    Subscribe via Twitter Followers   Subscribe via Facebook Fans
  • Recent Comments

  • Featured Authors

    Amos Yong is Professor of Theology & Mission and director of the Center for Missiological Research at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena. His graduate education includes degree...

    Jelle Creemers: Theological Dialogue with Classical Pentecostals

    Antipas L. Harris, D.Min. (Boston University), S.T.M. (Yale University Divinity School), M.Div. (Emory University), is the president-dean of Jakes Divinity School and associate pasto...

    Invitation: Stories about transformation

    Craig S. Keener, Ph.D. (Duke University), is F. M. and Ada Thompson Professor of Biblical Studies at Asbury Theological Seminary in Wilmore, Kentucky. He is author of many books<...

    Studies in Acts

    Daniel A. Brown, PhD, planted The Coastlands, a church near Santa Cruz, California, serving as Senior Pastor for 22 years. Daniel has authored four books and numerous articles, but h...

    Will I Still Be Me After Death?