Old Testament Foundations: A Biblical View of the Relationship of Sin and the Fruits of Sin: Sickness, Demonization, Death, Natural Calamity, by Peter H. Davids
The fruit of sin is reversed through the work of Jesus in two ways—through His sovereign grace and through the repentance and faith of men and women.
The point which needs to be underlined is that in no area are the effects of sin completely reversed in this age, although in all areas there is some reversal of each of the effects of sin.35 There is always some tension remaining, even if there is a significant taste of “the powers of the age to come” (Heb 6:5).36 While this protects the church against a triumphalism which denies the reality of the present battle, it also points in hope to the coming final victory and the present experience of the partial reversal of the fruits of sin. The “not yet,” while inducing a longing for the future, should give faith and hope in the present as we see the “already” and realize that as it happens, as the fruits of sin are reversed, it is not perfection, but simply a down payment on what is coming.
PR
Notes
1 Both of these first two statements would be accepted by all orthodox Christian theologians of whatever stripe. For example, The Westminster Confession of Faith’s article VI. “Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment Thereof” describes the original sin and its effects (G. I. Williamson, ed., The Westminster Confession of Faith for Study Classes [Philadelphia: The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1964] 53-61), but so does the popular Mennonite work by Paul Erb, We Believe (Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1969) 19-22, and Seventh-day Adventists Believe … (Washington, DC: Ministerial Association, General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, 1988) 87-91. We could go on and multiply examples, but these scattered ones should be sufficient.
2 The text refers to the multiplication of conceptions and childbirths and the connection of labor with this process, the same type of labor which will be associated with farming (3:17). It appears that the original design was that conceptions would be fewer, for there was no death to be overcome, and pregnancy and delivery would be without difficult labor. Of course we have no example of this happening through which to compare the before and after, so unlike some of the other consequences, this one is more of an extension from the text.
3 See Jacques Ellul, The Meaning of the City (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1970). While the city in scripture is usually a human attempt to overcome alienation, even Jerusalem becoming the abode of evil so that before the exile and again in Revelation it can be compared to Sodom (Rev 11:8), the vision of Rev 21 is of a new Jerusalem in which the idea of the city (or human community) is redeemed, for God is in that city and all sin is outside of it.
4 Like all Old Testament law, one cannot simply assume that this is appropriate for disciples of Jesus Christ. Instead, Christians must carefully examine the implications of the new era which has dawned in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus and from that learn how this law may or may not apply to their behaviour now.
5 We can observe this from archaeology when we compare the relative equality of tenth century Israel (although the living standard was modest) with the stark rich–poor contrasts of eighth century Israel. See Roland De Vaux, Ancient Israel, Its Life and Institutions (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1973) 72-73.
6 The blight and mildew were certainly classed with human sicknesses, for the laws of leprosy (Lev 13-14) include mildew in houses along with skin diseases under the same general category. Perhaps drought and scorching heat were also seen in this category or it may be that they are included here because they also led to human deaths.
Category: Biblical Studies, Fall 2006