The Blessings and Burdens of Revival: George Jeffreys: A Revivalist, a Movement and a Crisis, by Neil Hudson
Jeffreys believed there was no need to pray for revival to come, it was present, evidenced by unexpectedly successful evangelistic endeavours
However, it became clear that all the pastors within Elim did not readily accept Jeffreys’ view of the immediacy of revival. Most did not see the same results in their evangelistic endeavour as Jeffreys did. Few had been as affected by the Welsh Revival and so, Jeffreys’ view notwithstanding, there were numerous articles written in the denomination’s official magazine, the Elim Evangel, discussing the cause and nature of revival, although few direct answers for its apparent absence were offered. So whilst Jeffreys was declaring that revival was present, many of his own constituency were attempting to define the concept of revival and explain the necessary pre-conditions in which revival would take place. One of the reasons for this difference in expectation resulted from Jeffreys’ understanding of the relationship between revival and successful evangelistic endeavour. He believed that when evangelistic meetings attracted large crowds with people professing conversion this was evidence of revival. This contrasted with the prevailing expectation that revival would be something greater and more embracing than regular evangelistic services. Lancaster, a significant figure in the denomination in the post-war period, explained this differentiation between successful evangelistic campaigns and revival.19 Revival was ‘a spontaneous movement of the Spirit of God, which transcends organised events and embraces whole communities, even nations, with an overwhelming sense of the presence of God, leading to deep conviction of sin and widespread conversions.’20
He pointed out that the Welsh Revival remained a primary model for Elim’s expectations of what could happen in the future. The significant difference between Jeffreys and the other ministers in Elim was that Jeffreys saw no need to extend one’s hopes into the future, he believed he was seeing the same events in his ministry that had been witnessed during the Welsh Revival. Whilst Jeffreys continued to evangelise, declaring revival to be present, churches were acknowledging that they could not produce a revival in their own strength. Their emphasis centred on the preparations that could be made in prayer, so that the church would be ‘right with God’. Prayer was a key factor; that more churches had not seen revival was often assumed to be because of a lack of prayer.21
Jeffreys believed that when evangelistic meetings attracted large crowds with people professing conversion this was evidence of revival.
Category: Church History, Fall 2012, Pneuma Review